Sunday 27 June 2010

Science and religion

27 6 2010

I've been revising poems out of their little skins, and have just written a nice knotty bit of theology about how much we can hate one another, as the people who executed Jesus or rather caused his execution hated him: he forgave them and died to take away their sin but what a terrible way to go! No wonder his sweat was like boiling drops of blood in Gethsemane, knowing what he had to look forwards to and praying to let this cup pass. Atheist or Christian, you have to be compelled by the human drama of the passion though it's an uncomfortable thing to contemplate, the Nazis crucified at least one priest and who knows what goes on in some dictatorships so the passion can't be dismissed as historical in some far off time when people hated and killed each other, look at Stalin's chilling comment, one murder is dreadful, 27 million murders are just a statistic. Pol Pot seemed to have the same ideas and recently the tidal wave that devastated Burma dropped out of the News when the regime in power sternly repelled offers of international aid, after that came a blank, a black out of information but people must have suffered and died. In this context the idea that surged beneath the surface in eastern Europe before the Berlin Wall came down is cheering: one joke is a tiny revolution. Long may people all over the world dare to crack jokes about their governing powers like the one about secret policemen, why do they go round in threes? One can read, one can write and the third keeps a sharp eye on the two intellectuals!

Madness is caused by evil, cruelty and hatred, oh I know there's genetic evidence linking psychosis to a certain genetic makeup but that's like saying it's human nature, genetic composition comes linked to a person in his or her own right with relationships, a history and set of personal circumstances. Madness isn't meaningless nor does it descend out of a clear blue sky quite randomly, something has to trigger the flux of dopamine and that is sharp distress of some sort, show me someone diagnosed with a psychotic illness and I'll bet money there's a deeply unhappy person there made so by cruelty and hatred from other people. Madness has a function, it shows it does matter if we're horrid to one another this is not an amoral world, our words and deeds are deeply significant and evil ones drive people mad. If you like it is a spiritual barometer registering the evil people do, as unhappiness is, we all have the capacity to be miserably unhappy given certain circumstances so that must be in our genetic makeup as well, see what I mean that catch all explanation is unhelpful and no explanation at all. It's like the bit in CS Lewis's Voyage of the Dawn Treader where Eustace says in our world a star is a blazing cloud of gas. He is told no, that's what a star is made of not what it is.

Relying on a basic scientific "explanation" to the disregard of everything else would be like telling someone "Your genetic composition causes your person to trigger in me a mating instinct" instead of saying "I love you". I know which would be more likely to get me into bed, science is bloody good stuff for cause and effect and some intriguingly intricate explanations of the natural world, long live science but not to the exclusion of religion, literature and all our feelings. After all, having the explanation of the visible spectrum is fascinating but it doesn't describe the beauty of a rainbow, science enhances the beauty of the planet with understanding of the various lives and functions involved, science can't describe the effect of springtime, all that lovely greenness and buds opening from no human cause. And pretty silly we'd look if springtime failed, to understand it should be to cherish it with humility and gratitude, not to think we own it and it's come about exclusively for our benefit. Religion is blind without science, as Einstein remarked, adding that science would be lame without religion.

When I was mad the psychotherapists I saw told me I'd be cured if I admitted to hating my mother. Now that is bad science and one eyed science, for starters my Dad's behaviour to my dying mother had driven me mad and though my Mum was a tough character to be trusted with the tender care of three daughters she didn't want, I wanted to understand her better and find resolution, not chuck all the blame on her stupidly and misogynistically. I put up resistance to this idea and they started trying to trick me into slagging off my Mum, were they being bad mothers was that why I was angry? Etc etc. At that point I shut up, they weren't listening and were trying to twist my words, which chimed with rather a lot of childhood experience I wanted to understand better, not revert to like a cross two year old and scream and kick on the floor. Reading Charlotte Bronte's Shirley has helped me understand my Mum better, she was very like Mrs Yorke and like the character couldn't help her nature, there are some wonderful portraits from real life in the minor characters in Shirley, I'll leave you with a strong recommendation to get hold of a copy and read it!

1 comment:

  1. Why should religion not conform to direct cause and effect? History is about to find out.

    The first wholly new interpretation for 2000 years of the Gospel and moral teachings of Christ is on the web. Redefining all primary elements including Faith, the Word, Law, Baptism, the Trinity and especially the Resurrection, this new interpretation questions the validity and origins of all Christian tradition; it overturns all natural law ethics and theory. At stake is the credibility of several thousand years of religious history and moral teaching. What history, science and religion have agreed was not possible, has happened.

    Using a synthesis of scriptural material from the Old and New Testaments, the Apocrypha , The Dead Sea Scrolls, The Nag Hammadi Library, and some of the worlds great poetry, it describes and teaches a single moral LAW, a single moral principle, and offers the promise of its own proof; one in which the reality of God responds directly to an act of perfect faith with a individual intervention into the natural world; 'raising up the man' correcting human nature by a change in natural law, altering biology, consciousness and human ethical perception beyond all natural evolutionary boundaries. Intended to be understood metaphorically, where 'death' is ignorance and 'Life' is knowledge, this experience, personal encounter of transcendent power and moral purpose is the 'Resurrection', and justification for faith. Here is where true morality and perfect virtue, called righteousness begins.

    Here then is the first ever viable religious conception capable of leading reason, by faith, to observable consequences which can be tested and judged. This new teaching delivers the first ever religious claim of insight into the human condition, that meets the Enlightenment criteria of verifiable and 'extraordinary' evidence based truth embodied in action. For the first time in history, however unexpected, the world must now measure for itself, the reality of a new claim to revealed truth, a moral tenet not of human intellectual origin, offering access by faith, to absolute proof, an objective basis for moral principle and a fully rationally justifiable belief!

    This is 'religion' without any of the conventional trappings of tradition. An individual, virtue-ethical conception, independent of all cultural perception in a single moral command, and the single Law finds it's expression of obedience within a new covenant of marriage. It requires no institutional framework or hierarchy, no churches or priest craft, no scholastic theological rational, dogma or doctrine and ‘worship’ requires only conviction, faith and the necessary measure of self discipline to accomplish a new, single, categorical moral imperative and the integrity and fidelity to the new reality.

    If confirmed, this will represent a paradigm change in the moral and intellectual potential of human nature itself; untangling the greatest questions of human existence: consciousness, meaning, suffering, free will and evil. And at the same time addressing the most profound problems of our age.

    Trials of this new teaching are open to all and under way in many countries. For those individuals who will question their own prejudices, who can imagine outside the historical cultural box, with the moral courage to learn something new, and test this for themselves, to stand against the stream of fashionable thought and spin, an intellectual and moral revolution is already under way, where the 'impossible' becomes inevitable, with the most potent Non Violent Direct Action any human being can take to advance peace, justice, change and progress.

    Published [at the moment] only on the web, a typeset manuscript of this new teaching is available as a free [1.4meg] PDF download from a variety of sites including:

    [www]dot energon dot org dot uk

    ReplyDelete